<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rail madness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevindavis.org.uk/2009/09/rail-madness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevindavis.org.uk/2009/09/rail-madness/</link>
	<description>Charity Chief Executive, Politician, Husband, Father</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 09:54:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: northernheckler</title>
		<link>http://www.kevindavis.org.uk/2009/09/rail-madness/comment-page-1/#comment-2964</link>
		<dc:creator>northernheckler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2964</guid>
		<description>I just spotted this - sorry I&#039;m late I was delayed on the train.  
 
I don&#039;t think you&#039;re tuned in to this one. I&#039;m a season ticket holder on London Midland, and I too found the recent &quot;volunteer shortage&quot; Sunday closure to be utterly ridiculous. It&#039;s not the idea that they depend on volunteers that&#039;s ridiculous though - make no mistake this was an unofficial strike in all but name. Concerted efforts by workers exploiting a loop hole in their contracts. There&#039;d always be plenty of volunteers if they were happier in their work. 
 
I&#039;m not sure what the staff are unhappy about - from a passenger&#039;s point of view things have improved dramatically in the last 12 months recovering from a significant dip following the change of the franchise from Silverlink. On a day to day basis most trains are bang on time, there are more trains, more direct and &#039;semi-fast&#039; trains, and more carriages - meaning fewer standing passengers (I haven&#039;t stood for several months). 
 
However talking to other commuters, I&#039;d say most would think that privatisation has been very patchy - some good developments, but lots of really poor service. It&#039;s one of the few areas where I think there&#039;d be very definite wide scale public support for nationalisation, and for heavy subsidies to keep fares down. The communal benefit would be enormous. 
 
I think it&#039;s absolutely true that the lumbering behemoth that was British Rail had to change to give us a service fit for the modern age - I don&#039;t think that&#039;s yet been achieved though, and the splintering of the network has harmed not helped that process. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just spotted this - sorry I&#039;m late I was delayed on the train. </p>
<p>I don&#039;t think you&#039;re tuned in to this one. I&#039;m a season ticket holder on London Midland, and I too found the recent &quot;volunteer shortage&quot; Sunday closure to be utterly ridiculous. It&#039;s not the idea that they depend on volunteers that&#039;s ridiculous though - make no mistake this was an unofficial strike in all but name. Concerted efforts by workers exploiting a loop hole in their contracts. There&#039;d always be plenty of volunteers if they were happier in their work.</p>
<p>I&#039;m not sure what the staff are unhappy about - from a passenger&#039;s point of view things have improved dramatically in the last 12 months recovering from a significant dip following the change of the franchise from Silverlink. On a day to day basis most trains are bang on time, there are more trains, more direct and &#039;semi-fast&#039; trains, and more carriages - meaning fewer standing passengers (I haven&#039;t stood for several months).</p>
<p>However talking to other commuters, I&#039;d say most would think that privatisation has been very patchy - some good developments, but lots of really poor service. It&#039;s one of the few areas where I think there&#039;d be very definite wide scale public support for nationalisation, and for heavy subsidies to keep fares down. The communal benefit would be enormous.</p>
<p>I think it&#039;s absolutely true that the lumbering behemoth that was British Rail had to change to give us a service fit for the modern age - I don&#039;t think that&#039;s yet been achieved though, and the splintering of the network has harmed not helped that process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
